Legal Opinion

Crossland Savings, FSB v. Friedman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 12, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, Morris Friedman, a/k/a Peter Friedman, and Miriam Friedman appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), dated January 13, 1994, which, upon renewal and reargument, granted the plaintiff’s motion for leave to enter a deficiency judgment against them.

*352Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the appellants’ contention, the plaintiff was not required to personally serve them with notice of the adjourned date of the foreclosure sale since the appellants failed to serve an answer to the complaint or a notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simkins v. GruenspanNew York Supreme Court · 1983
  2. R. L. C. Investors, Inc. v. ZabskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ferreira v. County of OrangeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Tortorici v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. ACS System Associates, Inc. v. AMCC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  4. ACS System Associates, Inc. v. AMCC Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API