Legal Opinion
Ealey v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 31, 1994PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e for leave to serve late notices of claim or to have notices of claim deemed timely served nunc pro tunc, the petitioners appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated February 27, 1992, which denied their petitions.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Although the petitioners’ alleged claims accrued on June 30, 1990, they did not serve notices of claim upon the respondent until more than 13 months later. In their subsequent requests for leave to serve late notices of claim or to have the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Washington v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- D'Anjou v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Brown v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Mallory v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Gandia v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by13 opinions
- Bell v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Buddenhagen v. Town of BrookhavenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Finneran v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Keyes v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Morehead v. Westchester CountyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.