Legal Opinion · Dissent

Miles ex rel. Miles v. STU Insurance Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 16, 1993No. 92 CA 2112Published

1DissentGonzales, Judge

I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion with regard to the interpretation given to C.C.P. art. 1571. It (art. 1571) prescribes the procedure by which cases are assigned for trial. Assignment is a judicial activity, and C.C.P. art. 1571 prescribes what, as a court, it is required to do to meet this burden to fulfill its duties.

The official revision comments of art. 1571, in the annotated version of the code, sec. (a) states, “[n]o particular type or kind of notice is required, since the matter is to be regulated by the local rules of court.” The comment goes on the say in sec. (e)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. Board of Sup'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991
  2. Prejean v. OrtegoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Zachary Taylor Post No. 3784 v. RileyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Scott v. Frederick Pack & American Bankers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  5. Scott v. PackLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API