Legal Opinion

Hark'n Technologies v. Orange Whip Fitness X

District Court, D. Utah

Decided October 29, 2024No. 1:21-cv-00054Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH, NORTHERN DIVISION HARK’N TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Utah MEMORANDUM DECISION AND corporation, ORDER DENYING [106] MOTION TO EXCLUDE STEVE BEAN AS A Plaintiff, WITNESS AND MOTION TO COMPEL AND GRANTING IN PART [107] vs. MOTION TO AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER ORANGE WHIP FITNESS X, LLC et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:21-cv-00054-CMR Magistrate Judge Cecilia M. Romero This matter is before the undersigned on the consent of all parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (ECF 25). Before the court are two Motions: Defendants Orange Whip Fitness X, LLC,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lawrence R. Sperberg v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  2. Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Marta M. MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Cache La Poudre Feeds, LLC v. Land O'Lakes, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2007
  5. Starlight International Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API