Legal Opinion

Winegar v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1983No. 2-183A16PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.

CASE SUMMARY

Defendant-appellant Mary Inez Winegar (Winegar) appeals her jury convictions of theft 1 and attempted theft, 2 claiming trial court error in allowing testimony concerning an oral statement and in allowing eross-examination concerning her prior criminal record.

We affirm.

FACTS

The facts most favorable to the State indicate that on July 3, 1982, Officer Copeland (Copeland) of the Anderson Police Department was patrolling the Mounds Mall, a shopping center in Anderson, Indiana. Copeland saw Winegar in her car and decided to follow her into the shopping center…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Ashton v. AndersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Burton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Grassmyer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Fletcher v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Kenneth KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Sweet v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Decker v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Lepard v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Georgia Ann Miller v. Tran, M.D. TrinhIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API