Legal Opinion
Quindlen v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Decided May 15, 1972No. Civ. A. 14123PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAWKINS, Chief Judge.
RULING
The facts in this diversity action are essentially uncontested.
Stringfellow, an agent of Prudential, visited the apartment of Milton Quindlen, a retired Air Force Officer, and his wife, Frances Quindlen, on August 24, 1967. Mr. Quindlen applied for a $15,000 life insurance policy, completed Part I of the application that day and Part II was completed August 26, after his medical examination. Quindlen paid the first year’s premium on the policy applied for, $163.15, by authorizing the withdrawal of dividends accrued to another policy with Prudential. A “prepayment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. FieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Leube v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Neider v. Continental Assur. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Harding v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Johnson v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1980
- Matthews v. BUSINESS MEN'S ASSUR. CO. OF AM.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
- Humana, Inc. v. KingLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978