State v. Ewell
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARFF, Judge:
Appellant, Jason Ewell, appeals his convictions of aggravated robbery, claiming the trial court should have granted a mistrial due to a juror’s possibly prejudicial statement during voir dire and claiming the court misapplied the firearm enhancement statute. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
On December 12, 1991, Ewell was tried to a jury on one count of aggravated robbery. *1361On the second day of the jury trial before Judge Sawaya, defense counsel moved for a mistrial on the basis that he had just learned that one of the jurors, Jeffrey Bogaard, had been excused for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. JamesUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. HandleyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1986
- Gleave v. Denver & Rio Grande Western RailroadCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HuntUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. IrelandUtah Supreme Court · 2006
- Irving Place Associates v. 628 Park Ave, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. InCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Irving Place Associates v. 628 Park Ave, LLCCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.