Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Lougee

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 4, 1938PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, C. J.

I. The plaintiff requested rulings relating to the burden of proof and to the effect that it rested generally on the defendants, under the authority of Travelers Ins. Co. v. Greenough, 88 N. H. 391. No rulings in respect thereto were made unless by somewhat doubtful implication, but the plaintiff was entitled to none in its favor. It voluntarily assumed the ordinary position of a plaintiff in opening-the case and accepted the order for its closing. It thereby assumed the burden of proving it had not insured the defendant instead of requiring that action be taken in assertion of the claim of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Travelers Insurance v. GreenoughSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1937
  2. Davison v. ParksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919
  3. Atto v. SaundersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1915
  4. Schwartz v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1925
  5. New Hampshire Wholesale Fruit Co. v. PaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pacific Portland Cement Co. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
  2. General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. HinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  3. Medical Mutual Liability Insurance Society v. Mutual Fire, Marine & Inland InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., a Massachusetts Corp. v. Richard D. Sweeney and Ruth T. ConnellyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  5. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. StallingsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API