Legal Opinion

Spradlin v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 25, 1954No. Record 4196PublishedCited by 40 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

These two cases, by consent of the Commonwealth and the defendants, were heard together by a jury on two joint indictments under the maiming statute, Code, § 18-70; one charging that Roy Spradlin and Frank Jackson feloniously and maliciously assaulted one Charles M. Hamilton, and the other in identical language charging such assault upon one Gordon H. Richards.

Both defendants pleaded not guilty to each indictment and at the trial relied on an alibi as their defense. The jury resolved the conflicts in the evidence adversely to the defendants and by its verdicts found each defendant guilty of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Foster v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
  2. Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  3. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  4. Crutchfield v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  5. Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Rollston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
  2. Snyder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  3. Sutton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
  4. Briley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
  5. Washington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API