Spradlin v. Commonwealth
Supreme Court of Virginia
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
These two cases, by consent of the Commonwealth and the defendants, were heard together by a jury on two joint indictments under the maiming statute, Code, § 18-70; one charging that Roy Spradlin and Frank Jackson feloniously and maliciously assaulted one Charles M. Hamilton, and the other in identical language charging such assault upon one Gordon H. Richards.
Both defendants pleaded not guilty to each indictment and at the trial relied on an alibi as their defense. The jury resolved the conflicts in the evidence adversely to the defendants and by its verdicts found each defendant guilty of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Foster v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1942
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
- Crutchfield v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Williams v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Rollston v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1991
- Snyder v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Sutton v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1985
- Briley v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980
- Washington v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.