Legal Opinion

Hartman v. McFadden

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 13, 1984No. 13466PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREWITT, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff filed a petition seeking damages and an injunction. Plaintiff received a preliminary injunction, having deposited cash in lieu of bond as allowed by Rule 92.02(e). Thereafter, defendant filed a motion to dismiss which was sustained, the petition dismissed and the preliminary injunction dissolved.

Defendant then filed a motion seeking damages resulting from the injunction. Plaintiff sought a jury trial on the amount of damages. The trial court found “that the instant case is an equitable one and the request for a jury trial is overruled.” The trial court then…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. GeeserMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
  2. J AND P TRUST v. Continental Plants Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Home Mutual Insurance v. BaumanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1851

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Eickelmann v. EickelmannMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. McFadden v. HartmanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API