Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided February 5, 1937No. 36PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Harrington, J.,

delivering the opinion of the Court:

Under its petition, the defendant company claims that as the judgment entered against it and all costs and interest thereon have been paid, that judgment should be marked paid and satisfied on the record thereof.

*168In this connection, it claims

1. That the plaintiffs are not entitled to interest from April 13th, 1935, the date of the verdict, to September 13th, 1935, the date of the entry of judgment thereon.

2. That in any event the judgment entered was merely for $100,000 and costs, and did not include interest from the date of the verdict; and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Hawley v. BarkerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  3. Kelsey v. MurphySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858
  4. Tweed v. LocktonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1932
  5. Jacobs v. MurraySuperior Court of Delaware · 1921

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Nelson v. Canadian Industrial Alcohol Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API