Legal Opinion

Mark T. v. Jamie Z.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2011No. D057091PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

AARON, J.—

I

INTRODUCTION

Jamie Z. appeals from a final order of the trial court establishing a legal and physical custody sharing arrangement pertaining to L., the minor child of Jamie and Mark T. At some point after L. was bom, Mark filed a petition to establish his paternity, and the parties agreed to a temporary joint custody arrangement pursuant to which Jamie had primary physical custody of L. The court entered an order establishing Mark’s paternity, and entered a temporary custody order based on the time-sharing agreement that the parties had reached. Before the court entered a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Marriage of BurgessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Caro v. Procter & Gamble Co.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. In Re Marriage of LaMusgaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  5. F.T. v. L.J.California Court of Appeal · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Martinez v. VaziriCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Alameda County Social Services Agency v. M.P.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  3. E.C. v. J.V.California Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. Jacob A. v. C.H.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. Escobar v. ChaseDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API