Legal Opinion

Ratchford v. Fisk

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1964PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJack Stanislaw, J.

The Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation has until now participated in the defense of this action for damages for injuries the result of defendant’s alleged negligent operation of his automobile. At this time its attorneys have moved for an order permitting their withdrawal presumably as, for and on behalf of the MVAIC. The latter became involved in the action under the impression that defendant’s automobile liability insurance coverage had limits of only $5,000 —10,000, thereby rendering him the operator of an uninsured motor vehicle (Insurance Law, §§ 608, 601, subds. c, d, j;…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Arbitration Between Allstate Insurance & SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  2. In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & MoreyNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Torres v. O'KeefeAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1962
  4. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. KreskowskiNew York Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davidson v. Julian Bolt & Screw Co.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API