Legal Opinion
Dixon v. Bowen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 5, 1987No. 83 Civ. 7001 (WCC), 83 Civ. 8264 (WCC), 83 Civ. 8609 (WCC) and 84 Civ. 110 (WCC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are applicants for, or recipients of, benefits based on disability under the federal Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) and Old Age Survivor's Disability Insurance (“OASDI”) programs, both of which are administered by the Secretary of Health and Human Services ("the Secretary”) pursuant to the Social Security Act, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. (“the Act”). They sue on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Secretary’s use of the severity regulations (20…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Blum v. YaretskySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Heckler v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Johnson v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Pennsylvania v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Dixon v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Dixon v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Bailey v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Hill v. SullivanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Roman v. KorsonDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1993
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.