Legal Opinion
State ex rel. H.M.D.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 7, 2010No. 09-0508PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
This matter is before us on remand from the supreme court. When we previously reviewed it, J.D.1 had appealed a judgment terminating her parental rights to her two minor children, J.J.W. (born January 24, 2005) and H.M.D. (born November 30, 2005).2 We reversed the judgment and remanded the matter to the trial court for further proceedings. State in the Interest of H.M.D. and J.J.W., 09-508 (La.App. 3 Cir. 10/7/09), 20 So.3d 564. Relying on the five-day service requirement of La.Ch.Code art. 1021, we found the trial court erred in denying J.D.’s motion for continuance when domiciliary service…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Grasser Contracting Co. v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Lehman Ex Rel. Lehman v. Lycoming County Children's Services AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- State, in Interest of SmSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
- State, in Interest of Ae and JdLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. P.M.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- State in the Interest of P.M. & H.M.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2012