Legal Opinion · Dissent

Manuel v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 25, 1999No. 97-1041Published

1DissentWolf, J.

While I concur that the procedure for producing the transcript of the proceedings was not proper, I do not feel that the record before us is so deficient as to require reversal.

On remand to the trial court, counsel for both sides met with the deputy clerk who audio taped the trial and reconstructed the record to the best of their ability. Upon review, while there are a number of minor inaccuracies, I agree with the trial court that there is only one major deficiency. A brief portion of the tape recording remains unintelligible. The trial court said of that section,

The Court has reviewed that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph Stefan, Irvin Freedman, United States of America v. Irvin FreedmanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Thomas Elbert CashwellCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  3. Thrasher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. Osborne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API