Legal Opinion

Empire Cotton Oil Co. v. Continental Gin Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 18, 1917No. 8262PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Trover; from Eulton superior court — Judge Bell. May 6, 19-16. In June, 1910, the Continental Gin Company sold to J. C. and James Council certain machinery, taking purchase-money notes containing the following provisions: “This note given in part payment for the following machinery sold to the undersigned by Continental Gin Company, viz.: 3 70 saw R. H. Winship plain gins; 3 70 saw class C feeders; 1 210 saw condenser with support and flues, 1 20 saw lint flue; 1 30 inch…

Read the full summary

Trover; from Eulton superior court — Judge Bell. May 6, 19-16. In June, 1910, the Continental Gin Company sold to J. C. and James Council certain machinery, taking purchase-money notes containing the following provisions: “This note given in part payment for the following machinery sold to the undersigned by Continental Gin Company, viz.: 3 70 saw R. H. Winship plain gins; 3 70 saw class C feeders; 1 210 saw condenser with support and flues, 1 20 saw lint flue; 1 30 inch cylinder D. B. steam power press with transfer and feedings; 1 10 inch class C elevator, as per contract; shafting,…

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, J.

Whether or not the defendant occupied the position of a bona fide purchaser, a duly recorded purchase-money note reserving title to personal property described as follows: “The following machinery sold to the undersigned by Continental Gin Company, viz.: 3 70 saw R. H. Winship plain gins; 3 70 saw class C feeders; 1 210 saw condenser with support and flues; 1 20 saw lint flue; 1 30 inch cylinder D. B. steam power press with transfer and feedings; 1 10 inch class C elevator as per contract; shafting, pulleys, and belting as per contract,” was sufficient to afford record notice to third persons…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. A. S. Thomas Furniture Co. v. T. & C. Furniture Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Charles v. Valdosta Foundry & Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. International Clay Machinery Co. v. Moultrie Banking Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  2. Lasch v. Columbus Heating & Ventilating Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Liddell Co. v. CorkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  4. Skinner v. Stewart Plumbing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Farrell v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API