Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Harris Paint Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided May 1, 1970No. PCA 2156PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
ARNOW, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on motions of Plaintiff Harris Paint Company and of Defendant Seaboard Surety Company for summary judgment.
The portion of the Miller Act pertinent here is found in 40 U.S.C. § 270b which reads as follows:
“Provided, however, That any person having direct contractual, relationship with a subcontractor but no contractual relationship express or implied with the contractor furnishing said payment bond shall have a right of action upon the said payment bond upon giving written notice to said con*752tractor within ninety days from…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Coffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Bowden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Apache Powder Co. v. Ashton Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- T. F. Scholes, Inc., and United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Lock Joint Pipe CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961
- United States of America for the Use of General Electric Company v. H. I. Lewis Construction Co., Inc., and Aetna Insurance Company, and Third-Party v. The Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vigliarolo Bros. v. Lanza Contracting Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985