Legal Opinion

A. M. Barr Realty v. Guidice

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided February 6, 1973No. 6576Published

1Per curiam

Appellant a real estate brokerage firm (hereafter called the broker) sued appellees (hereafter called the owners) for a commission claimed to have been earned by finding a purchaser for their residence. The owners denied liability and counterclaimed for one-half of the deposit placed with the broker by the prospective purchaser. At the conclusion of the broker’s case the trial court directed a verdict against the broker on its claim and also directed a verdict for the owners on their counterclaim.

Viewing the broker’s evidence in its most favorable light, as we must, the following facts were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Thomas v. JacksonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API