Legal Opinion
Midlantic National Bank v. Kouterick (In Re Kouterick)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 24, 1994No. 08-20271PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
STEPHEN A. STRIPP, Bankruptcy Judge.
This is the court’s resolution of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed on Brian Quentzel, Esq. under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 9011 (“Rule 9011”) for misrepresentations and omissions of fact in a complaint, certification, and brief in this adversary proceeding. This matter arises from the petition of Charles and Mary Kouterick filed under chapter 13 of title 11, United States Code (“Bankruptcy Code” or “Code”) on May 29, 1992. The essential facts and procedural history of the matter are set forth in…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Matter of Stephen Yagman, Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney WeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Palumbo Family Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- In Re SchuesslerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- Olick v. Kearney (In Re Olick)District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- In Re RiveraUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- In Re Jazz Photo Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.