Legal Opinion

Canal 66 Partnership v. Reynoir

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided January 15, 2003No. 2002-CA-0355PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

11 McKAY, J.

The appellant, Gus Reynoir (Reynoir), as Succession Representative of Fred M. Reynoir, seeks a review of the trial court’s granting of a partial summary judgment in favor of appellee, Canal 66 Partnership (Canal 66), and denying his cross motion for summary judgment.

The pertinent issue for this Court to address concerns the interpretation of a ground and building lease agreement on an immovable property, entered into by the parties.1 On cross motions for summary judgment, the trial court was presented with the issue of the meaning of the rent recalculation provision of the lease…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. Select Properties, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  3. Peterson v. SchimekSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
  4. Two Feathers Enterprise v. First Nat. BankLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Washington v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP. & DEV.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gertler v. City of New OrleansLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Bah v. Continental Casualty Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
  3. South Peters Plaza, Inc. v. P.J., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API