Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deonier v. State, Public Employee Retirement Board

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1988No. 16706Published

1DissentBakes, Justice

The Court’s decision today spurns our controlling decision in Brock v. City of Boise, 95 Idaho 630, 516 P.2d 189 (1973). The plurality opinion even attempts to overrule the Brock case. However, the precedents of this Court cannot be overruled by a two-judge plurality opinion.1 Nor can a two-judge plurality opinion render an authoritative interpretation of I.C. § 72-1414, which is binding on the lower courts and administrative agencies. The most that can be said of the Court’s action today is that these claimants have prevailed, and they are going to receive additional benefits, i.e., the…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API