Legal Opinion

Waldschmidt v. Crosa

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1986No. 71170PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Judge.

Appellants, Mr. and Mrs. Waldschmidt, purchased a laundromat from appellee/defendant Crosa. Defendant Carolyn Robinson, an agent of V. R. Business Brokers, a company owned by defendant Phillip Kuban, acted as the sales broker. Dissatisfied with their purchase, and demanding that the sale be rescinded, appellants claimed that Crosa fraudulently misled them concerning, inter alia, the amount of income the laundromat had been producing and that Robinson and other defendants were Crosa’s agents in perpetrating the fraud. When their demand for rescission of the sale was rejected,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herring v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. Edelschick v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Raines v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  2. Roth v. ConnorCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  3. American General Life & Accident Insurance v. WardDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  4. Larson v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  5. Southern Intermodal Logistics, Inc. v. D. J. Powers Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API