Legal Opinion
C. T. Willard Co. v. City of New York
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1913Published
The nature of the action and the material facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerioh, J.
This action was originally brought to foreclose a lien acquired under a contract entered into on or about August 27, 1909, for a public improvement by the Robertson & Gerehart Contracting Company with the city of New York for regulating, grading and paving Bay Ridge parkway (Extension shore road), between Fourth avenue and Fort Hamilton avenue, in the borough of Brooklyn, city and state of New York. It appears that the said Robertson & Gerehart Contracting Company, which for the sake of brevity will be referred to hereafter as the contractor, also entered into other contracts with the city of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Fortunato v. . PattenNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Herrmann & Grace v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
- Berger Manufacturing Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Herrmann Grace v. . the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- United States v. McMullenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.