United States v. James Joseph Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
This is another Dyer Act case involving the transportation of a stolen automobile from Tennessee to Mississippi. Appellant was convicted and now appeals, bringing us complaints relating to (1) the denial of a bill of particulars, (2) the failure to give a Miranda warning, (3) an illegal search, (4) improper argument of counsel for the government, (5) the refusal to allow cross examination, and (6) insufficiency of the evidence. We find no merit in any of these objections. 1
The functions of a bill of particulars are to inform the defendant of the nature of the charge against him with…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Patricia Lebouef Murphy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Edward Fontenot, Deceased, Etc. v. Houma Well Service, and Eva C. Fontenot, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- James Leo Huth v. Southern Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Frank Roosevelt HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
- Odie Thomas Pipkin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
3Cited by15 opinions
- United States v. Edgar Chaux TrujilloCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Michael Mitchell BeardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- United States v. Eligio Fermin RiveroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Lupro v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- United States v. Roland George SchembariCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.