Legal Opinion

State v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided September 17, 2021No. 123045PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 123,045 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MEKA RICHARDSON, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. A motion to correct illegal sentence under K.S.A. 2020 Supp. 22-3504 may be summarily denied without the appointment of counsel when the motion, files, and records of the case conclusively show the defendant has no right to relief. Whether a sentence is illegal is a question of law subject to de novo review. 2. Jury unanimity on premeditation is required before a district court judge can convene the hard 40 sentencing hearing authorized under K.S.A. 1992…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. TimleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  3. State v. KingsleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1993
  4. State v. VontressSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. State v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. GuebaraSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. Kleypas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API