Legal Opinion

San Joaquin & Kings River Canal & Irrigation Co. v. Stanislaus County

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California

Decided June 29, 1908No. 14,554PublishedCited by 3 opinions

In Equity. On motion for preliminary injunction.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Circuit Judge.

In 1896 the San Joaquin & Kings River-Canal & Irrigation Company, a California corporation, and the predecessor in interest of the complainant, a Nevada corporation, brought suit in this court to enjoin the enforcement of an order of the board of supervisors, of Stanislaus county, fixing the rates to' be charged by the complainant for water distributed by it in said county. The complainant in its bill referred to the laws of the state of California under which it was organized, and set up certain facts concerning-the value of the property embraced in its canal system,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. San Diego Land & Town Co. v. National CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Stanislaus County v. San Joaquin & King's River Canal & Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. City of Newton v. LevisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1897
  4. Consolidated Gas Co. v. City of New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1907
  5. Hadden v. DooleyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Spring Valley Water Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1908
  2. Kansas City Gas Co. v. Kansas CityDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912
  3. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co. v. City & County of San FrancisoU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API