Legal Opinion

Manford v. Pleasant Grove & Indian Creek Turnpike Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Switzerland Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOsborn, C. J.

The main questions in this case were, fully considered in Hopkins v. The Greensburgh, Kingston, and Clarksburg Turnpike Co., 40 Ind. 44, and The Greensburgh, Milford, and Hope Turnpike Co. v. Sidener, 40 Ind. 424, and we do not think it necessary to reconsider them.

The appellees however insist; that, although lands liable to be assessed are omitted, the only remedy to the landowner was by application for relief to the board of equalization, under sec. 3 of the act of May 14th, 1869, 3- Ind. Stat. 538, of by appeal under sec. 8 of that act. Those sections give no power 'to assess lands…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Greensburgh, Milford, & Hope Turnpike Co. v. SidenerIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Hopkins v. Greensburg, Kingston, & Clarksburg Turnpike Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1872

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lyman v. HoweSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1897
  2. Muncie & New Burlington Turnpike Co. v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API