Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nickel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 19, 2002No. 01-15452Published

1DissentFernandez, Circuit Judge

I dissent because I believe that the district court opinion was, essentially, correct. I adopt it1 as my own, with one important caveat. That is, as I read the opinion, the court determined that in most instances the appropriate remedy for taking an excess fee should be repayment of that fee with simple interest.2 Nickel I, 991 F.Supp. at 1179-82. However, there may be times when it is proper to use a different measure.3

Because of the lack of tracing, the small amount of the fees in the whole picture, and the excessively speculative and inappropriate nature of the alternate solutions…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nickel v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API