Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Dean Kenneth Rockmore v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 5, 2014No. SC12-577Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partPolston, C.J.

I agree that the jury should have gotten the case to decide, but the trial court gave an erroneous jury instruction on abandonment that is not harmless. Therefore, I would quash the Fifth District’s decision affirming Rockmore’s conviction and remand for a new trial.

First, the majority’s conclusion that Rockmore’s abandonment defense was not supported by the evidence does not consider all the evidence by improperly focusing on the victim’s testimony to the exclusion of Rockmore’s. Under Rockmore’s version of events, once he knew he was caught, he chose to leave the stolen property behind.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Motley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1945
  3. State v. BakerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  4. Simmons v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API