Legal Opinion

Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada v. U.S. Bank National Ass'n

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 12, 2016No. 16-1049PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POSNER, Circuit Judge.

A common law principle that so far as we know is in force in every state of the United States forbids a person to own an insurance policy that insures someone *656else’s life unless the policy owner has an insurable interest in that life. Ohio National Life Assurance Corp. v. Davis, 803 F.3d 904, 907-08 (7th Cir. 2015). So you are allowed to own an insurance policy on your spouse’s life because the death of the spouse is likely to impose costs on you, but you cannot own an insurance policy on the life of a stranger who you happen to know is in poor health and likely to die…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  4. Ohio National Life Assurance v. Steven EgbertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  5. Venisek v. DraskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada v. Wells Fargo Bank NA (080669) (Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019
  2. Columbus Life Insurance v. Wilmington Trust NaArizona Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Estate of Russel Mechling v. U.S. Bank National AssociationDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
  4. Sherman Creek Condominiums Inc v. Mid-Century Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API