Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Godden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 23, 1927No. 7861Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

We think we erred in approving the trial court’s view that because the security or collateral not being judiciously handled to its best advantage, the “mismanagement was unintentional and chargeable to no party herein.”

We shall treat the question as a finding ,of mismanagement; and it does not matter whether the collateral was mismanaged by the payee or holder of the note, whether intentional or otherwise, it would release the sureties. Hatch v. Bank (Tex. Civ. App.) 270 S. W. 1093; Indemnity Ins. Co. v. Bassett (Tex. Civ. App.) 299 S. W. 714.

The motion for a rehearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hatch v. First State Bank of BrackettvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  2. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. BassettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API