Legal Opinion

Patterson, Guardian v. Snider Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1931No. Appeal, 187PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

The issue in this case is whether the plaintiff’s ward, an aged man, had contractual capacity when he entered into an agreement with the defendants, husband and wife, by which agreement he gave to them $3,500 to pay off the indebtedness on their home, in gratitude for the care and attention he had received from them and in consideration of the continued care they agreed to give him.

The action was assumpsit by the guardian against the husband and wife to recover the $3,500. The jury found in favor of the guardian. The court below entered judgment for the defendants…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. FaySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Grubbs v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1879
  3. Palmer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Elcessor v. Elcessor, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Masciantonio WillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
  2. Girsh TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Hagopian v. EskandarianSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Cleland v. PetersDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  5. Mahaley v. Stone, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Potter County1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API