Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Davis v. Davis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 2, 2004No. 2D03-1908Published

1Concurrence

VILLANTI, Judge,

Specially concurring.

I write to point out that most of the basis for this appeal could have been avoided had the trial court had in place *120more effective procedures for dealing with unauthorized ex parte communications and for communicating with the parties before issuing its ruling.

In this case, a friend of Heidi Susan Davis (the Wife) sent the trial court a letter admonishing the trial court for what the friend, and apparently the Wife, anticipated would be a ruling denying permanent alimony. The Wife, her friend, and Steven Michael Davis (the Husband) anticipated this ruling…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hutto v. HuttoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API