Legal Opinion

State v. Fardelman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 9, 1984No. 83-513PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order suppressing evidence of the results of an intoxilyzer test in a manslaughter case. An intoxilyzer is a device which measures blood/alcohol levels.

This case is like Drury v. Harding, 443 So.2d 360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) and we are in agreement with the Drury ruling.. Thus we must reverse the order of suppression. Appellee here also argues that the intoxilyzer device itself was not approved by the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services as the statutes required. We conclude that the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Rule…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Drury v. HardingDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Houser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. State v. BlackVolusia County Court · 1988
  3. State v. BlakeVolusia County Court · 1985
  4. State v. DingusVolusia County Court · 1984
  5. State v. PolikanCircuit Court for the Judicial Circuits of Florida · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API