Legal Opinion

Alcolea v. Smith

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 2, 1922No. 23079PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; George H. ThSard, Judge. Action by Rafael Alcolea against Hugh E. Smith. From a judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demand for certain jewelry on his paying the amount for which it was pledged or on default of its surrender for $8,500 shown to be considerably less than its value, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demand for certain jewelry on his paying $1,200, for which amount it was pledged to defendant, or, in default of its surrender, for $3,500, ‘shown to be considerably less than its value; the circumstances out of which the suit has arisen being as follows:

On September 25, 1915, by authentic act executed in New Orleans, plaintiff acknowledged that defendant had loaned him $1,200, and defendant acknowledged that he “had in his possession three diamond rings; one diamond stick pin; three sets of diamond…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Peugh v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Russell v. SouthardSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
  3. Lafitte, Dufilho & Co. v. GodchauxSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  4. Smith v. Shippers' Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  5. Pritchard v. EltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Gins v. Mauser Plumbing Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  2. Crowe v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
  3. Oklahoma City v. WellsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Russell v. Empire Storage & Ice Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  5. School District No. 1 v. Teachers' Retirement Fund Ass'nOregon Supreme Court · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API