Legal Opinion

People v. Mankel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1964No. Calendar 17, Docket 50,441PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

In this case we examine an information to determine whether what is contained therein alleges a crime to have been committed by him, of whose alleged conduct the court was informed.

We consider no facts. We take as true those set forth in the information. It says:

“James K. Miller, prosecuting attorney for the county of Kent, aforesaid, for and in behalf of the People of the State of Michigan, comes into said court, in the December term thereof, A.D., 1962, and gives it here to understand and be informed that one Gerard Mankel, of the county of Kent, on, to-wft, the 23d day of January, 1963, at…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. CoveleskyMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. SchneffMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. JonesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. People v. KirsteinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. AndersonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. ScarbroughMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API