Valdosta Drug Co. v. Mashburn Drug Co.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Per curiam
The Court of Appeals erred in reversing the judgment of the trial court. The contract, in accordance with which the notes were given, is to be treated as entire and undivided, although separate notes were given for the stock of goods purchased and for the good will of the Mashburn Drug Co., the vendor; and the plaintiff, Mashburn Drug Co., as is shown by the uncontradicted evidence in the record, having breached the covenant of this contract not to permit certain named officials to reengage in the drug business for the time and in the territory designated, was not entitled to recover on the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Shaw v. Jones, Newton & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Ward v. . HargettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
3Cited by9 opinions
- Insurance Center, Inc. v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
- Sires v. LukeDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1982
- Smith v. DavidsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
- Littlegreen v. GardnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
- Reid v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.