Legal Opinion
Peters v. E.W. Bliss Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 26, 1983No. Civ. A. No. 82-1998PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*342MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
VANARTSDALEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff’s complaint, filed on May 5, 1982, alleges that he was injured as a result of defendant’s negligent design and manufacture of a certain press machine. Jurisdiction of this court is alleged pursuant to the diversity requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1382 (1976). Although the plaintiff’s complaint was filed on May 5, 1982, service of process on defendant was not effected until August 25, 1983. Defendant E.W. Bliss Co. (Bliss) has moved this court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5), to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Albert Nealey v. Transportacion Maritima Mexicana, S. A. And Maersk LinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- H. Alpers & Associates v. Omega Precision Hand Tools, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Bersch v. Drexel Firestone, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
3Cited by10 opinions
- Gordon v. HuntDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- Arroyo v. WheatDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1984
- Shuster v. ConleyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- Ruley v. NelsonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1985
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Southold Development Corp. v. Mittemyer (In Re Southold Development Corp.)District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.