Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 2010No. 12-10-08PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogers, Judge.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Karen Wright, appeals the judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Putnam County denying her application to seal the records of her conviction for forgery. On appeal, Wright argues that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to conduct a hearing on her application pursuant to R.C. 2953.32. Based upon the following, we reverse the judgment of the trial court.

{¶ 2} In March 2003, in the Court of Common Pleas of Putnam County, Wright pleaded guilty to one count of forgery in violation of R.C. 2913.31(A)(3), a felony of the fifth degree.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Buckeye Supply Co. v. Northeast Drilling Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. State v. SaltzerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. WilliamsOhio Court of Appeals · 2010

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. State v. GrilloOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. State v. GainesOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. State v. N.S.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2025

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API