Legal Opinion

People v. Buggs

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 29, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s Batson challenge to the prosecutor’s exercise of a peremptory challenge to a black prospective juror. Even assuming, arguendo, that defendant met his initial burden by establishing a prima facie case of discrimination, we conclude that the prosecutor provided a race-neutral explanation for excluding the prospective juror, and there is no basis to disturb the court’s determination that the explanation was not pretextual (see, People v Virgil, 266 AD2d 847; People v Clark, 262 AD2d 1051, lv denied 93 NY2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. ClarkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. People v. HoskinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. People v. VirgilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API