Wheaton v. Anderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent met her burden of demonstrating that exceptional circumstances justify her relocation to Iowa with the parties’ child (see, Matter of Pecorello v Snodgrass, 142 AD2d 920, appeal dismissed 72 NY2d 1039). The record supports Family Court’s determinations that the relocation was prompted by economic necessity rather than economic betterment (see, Matter of Daniels v *930Daniels, 224 AD2d 931 [decided herewith]; Matter of Raybin v Raybin, 205 AD2d 918, 919-920) and that the child’s best interests will be served by continuing custody…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Raybin v. RaybinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Ladizhensky v. LadizhenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pecorello v. SnodgrassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Daniels v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Daniels v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996