Legal Opinion

Wheaton v. Anderson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent met her burden of demonstrating that exceptional circumstances justify her relocation to Iowa with the parties’ child (see, Matter of Pecorello v Snodgrass, 142 AD2d 920, appeal dismissed 72 NY2d 1039). The record supports Family Court’s determinations that the relocation was prompted by economic necessity rather than economic betterment (see, Matter of Daniels v *930Daniels, 224 AD2d 931 [decided herewith]; Matter of Raybin v Raybin, 205 AD2d 918, 919-920) and that the child’s best interests will be served by continuing custody…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Raybin v. RaybinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  2. Ladizhensky v. LadizhenskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Pecorello v. SnodgrassAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  4. Daniels v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Daniels v. DanielsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API