Legal Opinion

Budd Hoard Co. v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 26, 1925No. 15275PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

RAT, C.

This suit is for goods and merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered. Following is defendant’s amended answer:

“Comes now Budd Hoard Company, the above defendant, and leave of the court having first been obtained, files this its amended answer to plaintiff’s petition, and for answer to plaintiff’s petition herein, defendant, Budd Hoard Company, denies generally and specifically each and every allegation herein contained except such as may be hereinafter specifically admitted.
“Answering further, defendant denies that it owes the plaintiff the sum sued on in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. El Reno Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kurz v. StaffordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Washington v. Mechanics Traders Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. OgdenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API