Johnson v. Tully
Arizona Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the District Court of the First Judicial District in and for the County of Pima. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
This was an action brought by Johnson against L. Zeekendorf & Co., upon a' promissory note made by Tully, Ochoa & Co., and purporting to be indorsed by L. Zeekendorf & Co. The note reads as follows:
“$2,800. Tucson, A. T., September 17, 1881.
“Three months after date we promise to pay, to the order of L. Zeckendorf & Co., twenty-eight hundred dollars, at two per cent, interest per month, value received.
[Signed] “Tully, Ochoa & Co. Indorsed: “L. Zeckendorf & Co.
After the indorsement of L. Zeckendorf & Co., and upon the back of the note, these words were written:
“~We hereby waive protest.
“Tucson,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Good v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Moies v. BirdMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Rey v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
- Burton & Co. v. HansfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Jones v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- David Charles Bunnell v. Kristi Noem, et alDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025