Legal Opinion

State v. Schroth

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided April 1, 1997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.

On this appeal, we hold that the defendant, who violated the conditions of his admission into a pretrial intervention (PTI) *244program during the term prosecution was postponed, was properly returned to the criminal justice system for prosecution even though the order terminating him from PTI was entered after the final date of the original postponement term. We accordingly affirm the trial judge’s orders which terminated defendant’s participation in PTI and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment against him. We also affirm…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. David Javier GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  3. United States v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ChapmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API