State v. Schroth
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
MUIR, Jr., J.A.D.
On this appeal, we hold that the defendant, who violated the conditions of his admission into a pretrial intervention (PTI) *244program during the term prosecution was postponed, was properly returned to the criminal justice system for prosecution even though the order terminating him from PTI was entered after the final date of the original postponement term. We accordingly affirm the trial judge’s orders which terminated defendant’s participation in PTI and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss the indictment against him. We also affirm…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. David Javier GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. AllenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
- United States v. FosterDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1993
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ChapmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000