Roush v. State

THOMPSON, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying Roush’s Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief. In the motion, Roush contended that he was denied effective assistance of counsel and that the trial court erred in failing to inquire into the circumstances surrounding an alleged discovery violation by the state as required by Richardson v. State, 246 So.2d 771 (Fla.1971). We remand for an evidentiary hearing on the question whether appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel.

In his motion for post-conviction relief the appellant alleged, inter alia, that his…