Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 25, 1973No. 7329DC337PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

A general devise or bequest to a named person with a power of disposition transfers the property in, fee, and a subsequent limitation over of the “remainder” is void as repugnant to the absolute gift. But a devise or bequest of a life estate, with remainder over, including the power to convey a fee by the life tenant creates'only a life estate, not a fee simple. Rudisill v. Hoyle, 254 N.C. 33, 118 S.E. 2d 145 (1961); Darden v. Boyette, 247 N.C. 26, 100 S.E. 2d 359 (1957); Holland v. Smith, 224 N.C. 255, 29 S.E. 2d 888 (1944).

In the instant case Lillie Hill was devised by her…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Holland v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Richards v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Parsons v. Smith, TrusteeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Bell v. KillianSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  5. Rudisill v. HoyleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Estate of Stanley M. Carpenter, Deceased William R. Thomas, Administrator v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. Estate of Carpenter v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API