Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Jones

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1893PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Richland County, Lauder, J. Action by Theophilus L. Taylor against John R. Jones, for conversion. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The verdict was against the clear weight of the testimony and should be set aside. Mead v. Counte, 8 At.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Richland County, Lauder, J. Action by Theophilus L. Taylor against John R. Jones, for conversion. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals. The verdict was against the clear weight of the testimony and should be set aside. Mead v. Counte, 8 At. Rep. 374; Hicks v. Stone, 13 Minn. 434; Garrett v. Grecnwell, 4 S. W. Rep. 441; Sandwich Manufacturing Co. v. Fcary, 33 N. W. Rep. .485 ; Kaemmever v. Hauser, 29 111. App. 576; Jones v. McWalley, 11 S. E. Rep. 544; M. P. Ry. Co. v. Summers, 14 S. W. Rep. 779; Helfrich v. Hogden City Ry. Co., 26 Pac. Rep.,293; Atchison & C.…

1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, C. J.

Taylor, the plaintiff below and respondent herein, sued John R. Jones, the defendant and appellant, in conversion for the value of a team, harness, and'buggy. There was a verdict for plaintiff, a motion for a new trial denied, and judgment on the verdict. It is uncontrovertcd that respondent was the owner of the property prior to bringing this action, and that it was in-appellant’s possession; that respondent demanded the same, and appellant refused to deliver it. The answer alleged, in substance, that on the 2nd day of June, 1891, respondent delivered the property to appellant, as a pledge…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Northrup v. CrossNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Acton v. Fargo & Moorhead Street Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Heyrock v. McKenzieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Bidgood v. Monarch Elevator Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. F. A. Patrick & Co. v. AustinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API