Dehydrating Process Company v. A. O. Smith Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This private treble-damage action under section 4 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15, resulted in a directed verdict in favor of the defendant at the close of the evidence. Defendant urged a number of grounds. Only one, which goes to the heart of the matter, need be considered.
Defendant-appellee, a New York corporation with a factory in Wisconsin, is a national manufacturer of storage equipment; inter alia, a patented glass-lined silo, and a patented unloading device, hereinafter unloader. The unloader is a sweep-arm, installed inside at the bottom of the silo, which,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- International Salt Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Wilkerson v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kernan v. American Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- North Pennsylvania Railroad v. Commercial Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Honorable Ronald v. Dellums v. James M. Powell, Chief, United States Capitol Police, Jerry v. Wilson, Chief, Metropolitan Police DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation v. Diversified Packaging CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- California Computer Products, Inc. And Century Data Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs v. International Business MacHines CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Company v. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.