Hudson v. . Wetherington

The note sued on was payable to Clark, and the plaintiff alleged that his testator, Herriet, was the owner thereof for value. This was denied by the defendants, who also alleged that it had been paid. The only issues of fact submitted to the jury were:

"1. Did plaintiff's testator pay or purchase the note? Ans. — He purchased it.

"2. Has the note been paid? Ans. — No."

The findings of the jury on these issues are not reviewable in this Court, and we have nothing to consider except a plain question of practice, there being no exception to the charge of the Court (4) in any other respect. His…